Sexuality andreproduction are fundamental elements in human interaction and societyworldwide. Accordingly, most religions have seen a need to address the questionof a "proper" role for sexuality in human interactions. Differentreligions have different codes of sexual morality, which regulate sexualactivity or assign normative values to certain sexually charged actions orthoughts. The views of religions and religious believers range widely, fromholding that sex and the flesh are evil to the belief that sex is the highestexpression of the divine. Some religions distinguish between sexual activitiesthat are practiced for biological reproduction (sometimes allowed only when informal marital status and at a certain age), and other activities practiced forsexual pleasure. Some religions view certain types of sexuality as"immoral" such as homosexuality. In light of the fact that sexualityis such an integral part of religious discussion, where does the issue oferectile dysfunction treatments such as Viagra, fall in relation to religiousbelief and doctrine. This article looks at the impact the issue of Viagra hashad in relation to some of the major religions of our time.

While moreliberal branches of religious organisations have adapted perspectives moreconsistent with contemporary general secular culture. Many religions stillshare the idea that human sexuality was created with the twin purposes ofprocreation and intimacy and erectile dysfunction treatments are therefore onlyacceptable once they are taken within a marriage. For example, Christianityteaches that sexual intercourse must take place exclusively within marriage.Outside of marriage it always constitutes grave sin and excludes one fromsacramental Communion. Therefore, because sex outside of marriage is immoral,then the use of Viagra a drug specifically used to assist males to be able tohave sexual intercourse would most naturally be condemned as immoral if usedby single men. Within marriage the use of drugs such as Viagra to help overcomepathological conditions can certainly not be immoral.

Similarly,according to Islamic teachings impotency is a disease and should be dealt withas any disease. To seek a cure for a disease is advised by Prophet Mohammed (P)who said that "God has created no disease unless he created a cure for itas well, except old age". Islam also warns of several social problems inthe use of Viagra indiscriminately, claiming it may lead to more sexualpromiscuity and infidelity. Islam forbids celibacy as a form of religiouspractice, and considers the natural state for humans to be married.

Interestinglythe Catholic Church, whose teachings forbid contraception has approved of theuse of Viagra. The difference between use of such drugs and artificialcontraceptives is that contraceptives do not help overcome a pathologicalcondition. Being fertile is not a pathology. Viagra does not go against nature it assists nature. Artificial contraception does not assist nature it goesagainst nature. One interferes with God's will, but apparently the other doesnot.

Judaism alsoprohibits sexual relations outside of heterosexual marriage, so if Viagra istaken within marriage then is is deemed acceptable. However, the drug waspreviously prohibited because its coating was considered not kosher, inedibleover Passover, when contact with everyday ingredients, known as hametz, isforbidden under Jewish law. A leading Israeli rabbi reversed the ban in 2005,saying that the pill can be swallowed if it is encased in a special solublekosher capsule first. Viagra's Israeli manufacturer, PfizerPharmaceuticals-Israel, said swallowing the capsule does not breach Jewish lawbecause the Viagra would not come into direct contact with the body.

One religionwhere Viagra can never hope to secure a foothold is Buddhism. Buddhist monksand nuns of most traditions are expected to refrain from all sexual activity(Japanese Buddhism being a notable exception). A core teaching of Buddha'sfoundational first sermon is that "one should not pursue sensual pleasure(kama-sukha), which is low, vulgar, coarse, ignoble and unbeneficial. This isreinforced in many passages of the Sutta Pitaka, such as the Simile of theQuail, where Buddha teaches that sensual pleasures are "filthy, coarse,and ignoble" and "should not be pursued, developed, or cultivated;they should be feared." In addition, the second of the Four Noble Truthsstates that the ultimate cause of all suffering is attachment and desire(tanha), and the third states that the way to eliminate suffering is to eliminateattachment and desire. Sexual practices are characterised as both attachment(kama-upadana) and desire (kama-tanha). Sensual desire must be eradicated ifone is to progress spiritually.

Thisinformation has been brought to you by Firstmed.co.uk, the UK ' s leading onlineimpotence clinic.
If you wish to discuss any of the above issues in more detail, do not hesitateto contact info@firstmed.co.ukor call +44 (0)870 199 5287

Article Source: http://www.articlebag.com

Article Tags: erectile dysfunction treatments
About the Author -ABOUT THE AUTHOR WHEN OPTIMISATION NEEDS TO GO IN HERE Firstmed is the leading online male impotence clinic in the UK and specialises in genuine, prescription Cialis , and other leading erectile dysfunction medications.